I'm not sure they should be illegal, weather the RFC says so or not.
I've got an address in the CX tld (s@cx) - which I have to say is hard to
get email to. Usually works if you qualify it (s@cx.) - but I don't think
I should have to.
Scot
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Michael Stevens on Wed, Jan 12, 2000:
> > I can't remember the exact case but I think (using the Email::Valid
> > encapsulation of it for testing) that it has problems with hostnames
> > with only one part eg) foo@bar or possibly few parts . I'd have to
> > double check to ensure those actually are valid or not, though.
>
> E-mail addresses with domain part without dots are illegal
> according to (IIRC) RFC822.
>
> Vadik.
>
> --
> Sauron is alive in Argentina!
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
